The jubilation sweeping through Tottenham Hotspur after pulling off a remarkable survival act stood in sharp contrast to the despair engulfing West Ham United, whose slide into the Championship had felt like a matter of when, not if, for quite some time. Years of muddled thinking, poor recruitment decisions, and persistent inconsistency finally exacted their toll on the Hammers — and Spurs’ victory over Everton merely put the official stamp on what most had already accepted.

Yet one question continues to linger among supporters: what exactly were Everton playing at?

West Ham’s fate, in truth, was not sealed on the final day. Many frustrated fans insist the rot set in long before, with blame spread liberally across every level of the club over the course of several seasons.

Owner David Sullivan has drawn the sharpest criticism. Despite considerable spending in the transfer market, supporters argue that recruitment has been chaotic and completely devoid of any coherent long-term vision. Some have gone as far as suggesting that relegation might ultimately prove worthwhile if it serves as the catalyst for sweeping changes at ownership and boardroom level.

Former manager Graham Potter bore the brunt of early anger over a calamitous start to the campaign. West Ham looked vulnerable from the very first weeks, repeatedly shipping goals from set-pieces while baffling team selections continued to test supporters’ patience.

His successor Nuno received a more nuanced verdict. Many fans acknowledged a marked improvement in performances after his arrival, with results beginning to mirror those of a side comfortably placed in mid-table. The problem, supporters widely agreed, was that the recovery came far too late to undo the damage inflicted during the chaotic opening months.

Lucas Paqueta’s situation also generated significant debate. Several fans pointed to a noticeable lift in both morale and on-pitch performances following his exit, with some going further to suggest that the cloud of the ongoing FA investigation had weighed heavily on both his form and his commitment throughout the season.

The London Stadium remains as divisive as ever. While supporters concede it can occasionally produce a charged atmosphere, the move away from Upton Park continues to be viewed by many as a footballing mistake. The ground’s sheer scale and design are frequently cited as factors that drain the life and intensity from matchdays.

Some supporters even cast an envious eye toward newly promoted sides Leeds United and Sunderland, whose vibrant Championship campaigns prompted uncomfortable questions about how a club of West Ham’s resources and standing had managed to perform so poorly by comparison.

The fanbase itself was not entirely exempt from scrutiny. One supporter candidly acknowledged that the mood around the club had grown increasingly toxic, pointing to half-time booing during pivotal matches as evidence of an impatience and negativity that had done little to help matters on the pitch.

Aston Villa were also pulled into the post-mortem, with one incensed fan declaring they would never forgive the Midlands club over what they considered a limp display against Tottenham in a contest that carried huge survival implications.

And true to form, VAR received its share of the blame too. While most acknowledged the technology was not the primary cause of relegation, many supporters used the opportunity to vent long-held frustrations, with the overwhelming feeling among match-going fans being one of total disillusionment with the system.

Amid the gloom, however, a number of West Ham supporters are already attempting to shift their gaze forward, daring to hope that a season in the Championship could offer the breathing space needed to strip things back, rebuild with purpose, and eventually return to the top flight on far sturdier foundations.